Advocating for Tobacco Harm Reduction
I might as well go all "thread" with this.
I expect most everyone in my follower circle already realize that a large portion of the public health journal articles in our area are pure junk science (and that is the charitable interpretation).
1/ https://twitter.com/carlvphillips/status/1438118127603171332
So close.
The “preprint” (terrible term) explosion has prompted journos and researchers to warn readers papers might not be right and need expert interpretation.
Now if they can just figure out this generalizes to journal articles, that would be real progress.
"Democrats' tax bill would impose a $100.66 excise tax on every 1,810 milligrams of nicotine, adding approximately $60 in taxes to that 60-milliliter bottle of 18-milligram strength e-liquid."
The added tax on deadly cigarettes? One dollar.
Angry yet?
https://reason.com/2021/09/15/if-the-fda-doesnt-kill-the-vaping-industry-the-democrats-tax-hike-just-might/
